Cancer Research: What Are The Results So Far

By Jason Myers

The intransigent, self serving, close mindedness of some members of organized medicine is being shattered by sharp truths fired by scientists from all parts the country.

It is turning out to be preposterously apparent to the big "Cancer Research" associations, that no matter how many guinea pig volunteers at U.S. penitentiaries they immunize with liver cancer cells, the volunteers do not get cancer. Regardless of how much time is wasted repeating this experiment and how much public money is consumed in a benighted attempt to square a circle, the lustre of the words, "There is no cancer in normal metabolism," becomes brighter.

This viewpoint is no longer as controversial as it was before. Today, a doctor from the Mayo Clinic and Mayo Foundation can inform the board of trustees of the Allergy Foundation that allergy is thought to be very related to the natural process of immunity, which include the body's creation of antibodies to combat invasion by germs, and that proof of many types has revealed that factors in the body's resistance are associated closely with the inception and succeeding course of human tumor.

Theorists have suggested that cancer cells may develop from time to time in the normal body, but that a lot of these are adequately not normal to be striked effectively by the body's natural defenses. Today, it is becoming increasingly hard to reject the role of the liver in cancer, especially ever since the detection of the TIP - Tumour Inhibitory Principle - which is produced by this organ. The regular liver produces a chemical factor that effectively inhibits growth of experimental cancer in mice. The part is imparted both to the blood serum as well as to the bile and has never been found in cancer patients.

The evidence implies the hypothesis that shortage, either inherited or obtained, of such inhibitory factors may be elemental to the cause of cancer. - 30427

About the Author:

Sign Up for our Free Newsletter

Enter email address here